The Generic Feedback Crisis
If you ask any manager why they struggle with performance reviews, the answer often boils down to two things: time and documentation. Managers are expected to synthesize an entire year of activity into a few paragraphs, often spending an estimated 210 hours annually on the process, only to be undermined by recency bias or a lack of specific, timely examples.
This administrative burden leads to generic, low-quality feedback that fails to inspire or motivate. The shift to continuous performance management addresses the timeliness issue, but continuous feedback alone is not enough. The secret to effective performance management lies in personalization. Employees are hungry for insights that are specific to their strengths, their challenges, and their unique career trajectory.
Moving From Evaluation to Development
Moving managers beyond vague summaries to specific, evidence-based coaching is one of the easiest use cases of AI—and organizations should take immediate advantage of it.
Modern AI tools work by connecting and analyzing vast, multi-source data—from goal-tracking systems and project management tools to communication patterns in the flow of work. This provides a rich, continuous tapestry of performance data that no human manager could manually synthesize.
Instead of writing, "John has shown great communication skills this quarter," AI can arm the manager with specific, timely examples, such as: "During the Q2 launch, your clear, detailed update in Slack accelerated the team's decision-making by two days. Let's discuss how we can apply that same clarity to stakeholder communications in your next project."