Learn how data-driven insights and continuous employer-manager communication transform performance reviews into drivers of growth.
Sara Braun
Editorial Strategist, HR
Workday
Performance reviews are built to show employees how they’re doing and what’s next. In reality, they tend to fall short.
Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends report found that 72% of workers and 61% of managers could not say they trust their organization’s performance management process.
Rebuilding trust in performance evaluation starts with the quality of the process itself. Employees need reviews that truly reflect the work they did, expectations they were held to, and feedback they received along the way.
That makes the formal review less about an annual rating and more about incorporating performance data, feedback, and conversations into the employee relationship year-round.
Report
A performance review is a structured conversation that evaluates an employee’s contributions over a defined period and sets direction for future performance and development. Depending on the organization, reviews may happen annually, semiannually, or as part of a more frequent performance management cycle.
A useful job performance review typically brings together:
The review itself should not be the first time performance is discussed. When managers document progress as it happens, reviews stop being guesswork and start driving meaningful conversations about what’s next for an employee.
Rebuilding trust in performance evaluation starts with the quality of the process itself.
A strong performance review process gives employees a clear understanding of their performance and where they should focus next. Managers can make the conversation more useful by preparing thoroughly, grounding feedback in evidence, and treating the review as one component of a broader performance process.
The key steps to conducting an effective performance review are:
1. Build the review around performance data and context
2. Give specific, actionable feedback
3. Calibrate performance ratings across managers
4. Evaluate performance separately from potential
Before the meeting, review the employee’s performance across the full review period and gather the evidence needed to support a balanced assessment. Useful inputs ahead of conducting formal reviews include:
Ask the employee to reflect on major contributions and obstacles before the meeting. These employee evaluations can help surface work the manager may not have seen directly and provide useful context for the conversation.
Ground feedback in concrete examples so employees understand what happened and what stronger performance would look like.
A Cornell-led study published in late 2025 found that employees perceived narrative-based performance feedback as fairer than numerical-only evaluations and reported stronger intentions to improve afterward.
Employees should have room to add their own perspective as well. Ask where they encountered barriers, what helped them perform effectively, and what support would make a difference going forward. The result should feel like a conversation about performance rather than a manager delivering a verdict.
Employees view narrative-based performance feedback as fairer than numerical-only evaluations.
Before reviews are finalized, managers should compare how they are applying performance standards across teams. Calibration sessions give leaders a chance to examine how ratings were reached and identify places where expectations may be interpreted differently.
The discussion should focus on evidence. Managers can compare:
HR can help facilitate these discussions and flag patterns that deserve a closer look. These conversations can then be used to create a performance review template for managers to follow.
When money and promotions are on the line, performance calibration is essential. Consistency isn’t about forcing identical ratings across teams; it’s about holding comparable work to the same standard.
Performance and potential answer different questions. Performance reviews should first assess what an employee delivered during the review period and how effectively they met the expectations of their current role.
Potential looks ahead to whether someone may be ready for greater scope or a different role. Strong performance today does not automatically indicate readiness for the next level, just as someone with long-term potential may still have areas to develop in their current position.
Keeping those judgments distinct gives employees clearer feedback. The performance conversation establishes where they stand today, while development planning can focus on what they need to build for future opportunities.
Use regular check-ins throughout the year to revisit goals and capture feedback while the context is still fresh. That allows employees to respond to feedback before the formal review and keeps changing priorities reflected in their goals.
Each annual performance review can then synthesize conversations that have already happened instead of reconstructing months of performance from memory.
Workforce management solutions can help maintain that continuity by bringing goals, check-ins, feedback, and performance history into one system. AI can also help managers organize information or draft feedback, while still keeping the manager accountable for the final assessment.
Workforce management solutions can help maintain continuity by bringing goals, feedback, and performance history into one system.
To ensure employee engagement remains high across the process, it’s critical that managers are direct about any shared commitments. End the review with clear next steps and document what both sides agreed to, including:
Those commitments should carry into future check-ins. If development was discussed, managers should revisit whether the employee is getting the experience or support they need. If performance needs to improve, both sides should know what progress will look like and when it will be assessed again.
Performance reviews influence decisions that extend well beyond the meeting itself, from development opportunities and advancement to compensation and additional support. That makes the quality of the process essential.
When reviews are grounded in current goals, specific examples, ongoing feedback, and shared expectations, they become more than an evaluation—they help employees understand where they stand today and how they can keep growing professionally in the future.
For organizations, that same clarity leads to better talent decisions and a more transparent company culture. A more consistent, evidence-based review process helps managers evaluate performance fairly, identify development needs, and support employee growth in a way that elevates the entire business.
Feeling the strain of rapid market changes on your talent strategy? Develop a plan to unlock workforce potential with the right skills technology in this Workday Buyer's Guide.
Report
A gap between effort and impact is the real ROI problem. Discover the solution.