Five Blockers to AI Adoption in Australia
In my conversations with industry experts, I asked why this was the case. They were clear that the main blockers aren’t technical – they’re organisational.
Their observations about the top blockers tie in with what the CFOs at our Finance Think Tanks are seeing on the ground:
1. Controls, governance and auditability: In finance, trust matters most and there is no acceptable margin of error. When payroll runs, the books close, or compliance is on the line, almost right is wrong. I believe this is the biggest reason that CFOs in Australia are hesitant to adopt agentic AI in their organisations.
2. No clear owner for AI transformation. Agentic AI introduces a different level of autonomy and accountability than traditional automation. Middle management often hesitates to take ownership of AI agents that feel risky or unfamiliar, particularly when benefits span multiple functions. Without clear sponsorship, transformation stalls.
3. Agentic AI skills: Many finance teams have become expert consumers of existing technology, but they lack the skills needed to reimagine how work gets done. This is more than just understanding how to prompt or build an agent – it's about innovating from the ground up, instead of simply improving current processes.
4. Shadow AI usage. As our Finance Think Tank participants told us, employees already use generative AI to write, summarise and analyse – often quietly. Having the right balance of governance and trust in your people is critical, so they can experiment in a safe space that doesn't compromise the integrity of the finance function.
5. Difficulty proving the business case. Finance leaders know better than anyone that transformation needs a baseline. Yet many finance functions lack solid metrics around effort, cycle time and decision quality, making it hard to quantify the upside of AI-driven change.